Surprising Your Opponents with the Kupreichik Sicilian
Should You Trust Me?
Before we start this blog, I need to point out two important things:
- I am not a statistician, so please make sure to check the data yourself! I used the Lichess Masters Database and its statistics for this article.
- I believe that working on your middlegame and endgame skills is the best way to improve. However, I have to admit that I also believe that changing your opening repertoire or trying out new openings can be a very powerful tool!
Now, let's get to the point!
When it comes to responding to the most popular first move, 1.e4, we all have to decide what we want to play.
We can choose something like the French Defense, Caro-Kann, or Scandinavian Defense, which allow White to establish a strong center before we fight back with counterplay. Alternatively, we can choose the more principled 1...e5 and test ourselves in the various systems that arise against the Ruy Lopez, Italian Game, and Scotch Game. Or we can take the aggressive route, like many players do, and go for the Sicilian Defense!
In my opinion, the Sicilian offers an excellent variety of different positions and opportunities for players who enjoy aggressive and complex games, as well as for those who like to work on their openings and use their opening knowledge as one of their main strengths.
The Sicilian, But Which One?
Once we decide that we want to play the Sicilian, the next question is which Sicilian we should choose.
If White continues with 2.Nf3, we have an enormous number of options. A lot of players like to go for the Sveshnikov or Kalashnikov, where we commit to 2...Nc6, but because 3.Bb5 has become a major option for White and an increasing number of players are choosing not to enter the traditional positions that arise after 3.d4, the 2...Nc6 move has become less popular recently.
Other than 2...Nc6, we can choose to enter various less common systems with moves such as 2...Nf6, 2...a6, or even 2...g6, or more popular lines arising after 2...e6, which can lead to the Kan, Taimanov, or Four Knights Sicilian. The most common second move is 2...d6, where we still haven't committed to a specific system, but a large number of games eventually enter the well-known Najdorf complex. Many players consider the Najdorf one of the most serious answers to 1.e4, and almost a mandatory weapon for anyone who wants an aggressive repertoire and intends to play for a win with Black.
All in all, we have a lot of options!
Following The Numbers
Many years ago, wanting to see which Sicilian variations performed best in practice and which ones were at least somewhat supported by engine evaluations rather than being statistical tricks, I started looking at the numbers.
This led me to a very interesting variation: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3
Up to this point, we have followed the most common move order, and now we can choose whether to play the Najdorf with 5...a6, move into the Classical Variation with 5...Nc6, or play the Dragon with 5...g6.
But those aren't our only options!
The move with the best statistics, and, remarkably, one where Black actually has a positive score according to the database, is the Kupreichik Variation, beginning with: 5...Bd7
Before we learn more about the variation itself, let's look at the numbers I was talking about: Lichess Masters Database: 32% White / 36% Draw / 33% Black (Average rating: 2427)
That's a very interesting statistic, especially considering that we are looking at a Masters Database. This means that the data should give us at least a reasonably good indication of how practical the opening can be at a high level. However, do keep in mind that there are only 1.300 games (around 1% of the games continued 5...Bd7) in the Lichess Masters Database, and the statistics would likely be different if there were more games.
Now, does this data actually mean anything in practice?
Probably not much for you as an individual player. It certainly doesn't mean that if you start playing this variation, you will automatically start winning games just because of the statistics. But, it is a good indication that there is something about this variation that makes it, at the very least, a serious weapon worth investigating.
Who Was Kupreichik?
I didn't have many resources available to me when researching his life, but what we do know for certain is that the variation was named after the Belarusian Grandmaster Viktor Davidovich Kupreichik.
Born in 1949 in Minsk, he achieved some serious results throughout his career. He won the Belarusian Chess Championship in 1972 and 2003, and he also finished first at the Wijk aan Zee Masters Tournament in 1977 and the Reykjavik Open in 1980. Those results alone are already impressive and certainly worthy of respect!
Looking through some Russian-language sources, I also found that many players, including the well-known grandmaster Alexei Suetin, considered Kupreichik an extremely aggressive and imaginative player.
Suetin described him as:
“A chess player of a bright combinational style, distinguished by a rich imagination, the absence of any template, always ready to take risks.”
It was genuinely interesting to research this article and learn more about him!
Back to the Variation!
As we mentioned, the variation arises after: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 Bd7
So, what is the idea behind this move?
Essentially, Black is not yet committing to a particular Sicilian structure. Instead, ...Bd7 is a useful move in several different setups. The bishop takes control of the b5-square, doing so with a piece rather than with the a-pawn, as we see in the Najdorf. On top of that, Black is preparing to play ...Nc6. If White captures the knight, Black can recapture with the bishop, meaning that we can consider the problem of our light-squared bishop solved in a rather imaginative way.
Game 1 - The Most Common 6.Bg5
Take a look at this model game between Maxime Vachier-Lagrave and Magnus Carlsen, where White continued with the main move 6.Bg5. Pay attention to how Carlsen used the fact that his bishop controls the b5-square to his advantage. He exchanged his light-squared bishop relatively early, getting rid of a piece that can often be difficult to develop in many Sicilian structures because of White's pawn structure.
Game 2 – The Peaceful 6.f3
In the next game, Daniil Dubov vs. Li Chao, take a look at how Black transitions into a Dragon setup under favorable circumstances after forcing White to play Be2.
Game 3 – The Aggressive 6.Bc4
The move Bc4 is considered an aggressive approach against many Sicilian variations, especially the Dragon. What happens when White tries it against the Kupreichik?
You can see it in the game Ian Nepomniachtchi vs. Vadim Zvjaginsev, where Black managed to completely take White out of their preparation and reached an advantageous position in fewer than 12 moves.
Game 4 – The Most Serious Test, 6.f3
If we go back to the statistics, we can see that 6.f3 is the most serious test and that White performs very well with it. However, this was not a problem in the game Alexander Morozevich vs. Peter Svidler, where Svidler positioned his light-squared bishop on c6 and successfully executed the ...d5 break, completely turning the game in his favor.
A Clever Waiting Move
In principle, 5...Bd7 is a clever waiting move. It keeps Black flexible and allows Black to transition into favorable versions of other Sicilian systems, while also having its own independent lines.
It is not an easy variation to learn because you need to understand when you want to transpose into which structure, under what circumstances, and when you should instead play an independent line. At the same time, it can be surprisingly difficult for White to prepare against. In many cases, you can look at your opponent's repertoire, anticipate which types of positions they are likely to aim for, and then steer the game in a direction that makes life uncomfortable for them.
All in all, this is a very interesting variation.
And if you are interested in learning more about it, I would be more than happy to write another blog about the Kupreichik Variation!

Hello, everyone!
As I begin this exciting journey of blogging about chess, I’d appreciate your feedback on my posts. Your encouragement and constructive criticism mean a lot and help me grow as both a writer. My goal is to create content that inspires, educates, and connects with chess enthusiasts of all levels.
If you’re interested in improving your own chess skills, I also offer personalized coaching sessions! You can find more details on my profile.
Thank you for reading, and I wish you great success and joy in your own chess adventures!