lichess.org
Donate

Your Opponent Gives You a Gift Every Move (Most Players Never Open It)

Thanks for sharing your blog. :)

Thanks for sharing your blog. :)

Also useful for your own blunder checks. "For the move I am considering making, what am I undefending? What gift am I about to give to my opponent?"

Also useful for your own blunder checks. "For the move I am considering making, what am I undefending? What gift am I about to give to my opponent?"

Very nice article with good examples!

Small nitpick, I am not sure if this consideration is relevant, or perhaps could be reworded to reflect the underlying thought

"Did they move a piece off a square you’d love to occupy yourself?"

Very nice article with good examples! Small nitpick, I am not sure if this consideration is relevant, or perhaps could be reworded to reflect the underlying thought "Did they move a piece off a square you’d love to occupy yourself?"

Greetings, thank you!!
great one!!

Greetings, thank you!! great one!!

@TheCaptain7777 said ^

Also useful for your own blunder checks. "For the move I am considering making, what am I undefending? What gift am I about to give to my opponent?"

That's a good point actually

@TheCaptain7777 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/lBBPQT0k) > Also useful for your own blunder checks. "For the move I am considering making, what am I undefending? What gift am I about to give to my opponent?" That's a good point actually

Very helpful and educational blog! I wish everyone would be able to read this.

I must add that though - (not to be a nerd or anything) that you have to add the "contains sponsored...." logo, because you advertised your chess able course.

Very helpful and educational blog! I wish everyone would be able to read this. I must add that though - (not to be a nerd or anything) that you have to add the "contains sponsored...." logo, because you advertised your chess able course.

I remember during a classical tournament chess festival, I was playing a NM and he played Nxe4? I was very surprised but I saw there was tactics and then I figured that by first hxg6+ fxg6 his king was very weak and him playing Nf6xe4 only wins a pawn but the knight had abandoned the defence of his king especially the dark squares, took me like 40+ minutes to calculate the variations, hands shaking I played Bxh6! after black played fxg6 earlier, sacrificing the queen temporarily for a knight and a bishop later! He only realised after Nxd2 Bxd2+ that he had to play Bh6, so Bxh6+ Kh7 Nf3! the g5 square is fatal and after black played Rf5 and me playing Ng5+ he resigned, seeing that Rxg5 is met by Bxg5+ and winning the queen back with interest
chess.png

I remember during a classical tournament chess festival, I was playing a NM and he played Nxe4? I was very surprised but I saw there was tactics and then I figured that by first hxg6+ fxg6 his king was very weak and him playing Nf6xe4 only wins a pawn but the knight had abandoned the defence of his king especially the dark squares, took me like 40+ minutes to calculate the variations, hands shaking I played Bxh6! after black played fxg6 earlier, sacrificing the queen temporarily for a knight and a bishop later! He only realised after Nxd2 Bxd2+ that he had to play Bh6, so Bxh6+ Kh7 Nf3! the g5 square is fatal and after black played Rf5 and me playing Ng5+ he resigned, seeing that Rxg5 is met by Bxg5+ and winning the queen back with interest ![chess.png](https://image.lichess1.org/display?op=noop&path=ToS7Z-0MhkPF.png&sig=d975a6a5c7551a1f8827bee8ae875288430547cb)

https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=webp&h=550&op=thumbnail&path=n2vXt2cPMxon.webp&w=880&sig=2c503614e6cb8633ad86779e3047c074a87e32d4

Playing e5 is terrible because you take the center.

for example:

1.dxe5 nxe5 2.nxe5 qxe5 3.qxd5 white is winning!

https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=webp&h=550&op=thumbnail&path=n2vXt2cPMxon.webp&w=880&sig=2c503614e6cb8633ad86779e3047c074a87e32d4 Playing e5 is terrible because you take the center. for example: 1.dxe5 nxe5 2.nxe5 qxe5 3.qxd5 white is winning!